In this day and age, the corposystem has taken control over the education system and is teaching us basically the reverse of what I said yesterday (Bare Bones Biology 174). It is teaching us that happiness is the goal of human life – rather than the contentment of a job well done – and it is teaching us that we humans can control the Laws of Nature (therefore there is no point to studying the needs of any other part of the Life system.) It is teaching us that we do not need to know the basic laws of Life on Earth; that all we humans need is humanism.
If that were the case, then our happiness would be easy, but in fact humanism is not enough, because humanism today believes in the dominance of humankind over everything else, and that is not really true, so you begin and end with a lie that benefits the welfare only of deep pockets (the corposystem, defined below) and causes irreparable harm to the balance of Life (the Biosystem/Ecosystem defined below).
The ideals that are taught by the corposystem are a lie, and we can’t align ourselves with a lie because the reality is that we simply don’t fit in, and we always know that we do not fit. Knowing that we do not fit is not happiness and provides us no way to do a job well done.
Thus humans generally don’t have the information they need to align themselves with factual reality, and therefore human-kind is always looking to buy something to make us happy. Or, if one aspires to the upper classes, finding something to sell. The current generation seems very hung up on trying to prove they each are better than the other – another impossible goal – or yet more incredibly trying to prove that we know more about what the Biosystem needs than even the Biosystem “knows.”
And so the Corposystem is in a constant impossible war for dominance against the Biosystem, and humans are constantly engaged in impossible wars for dominance over each other. Confusion creates war creates money, and the function of the corposystem is to make always more money, without regard to the welfare of the people, or rather using the fake image of welfare to activate and reactivate that imitation welfare-money-imitation welfare-money cycle.
Entirely to the contrary, the function of the Biosystem is to maintain Life. And that is what my blog is all about.
If you followed Bare Bones Biology from the beginning, I have progressed over the 3+ years, beginning more or less with facts about the whole of the Biosystem, and then working more toward study of facts, realities and truths at the level of biological and social communities, and lately I’ve been talking more about individual human realities.
During that period of time, the corposystem has co-opted some words that I need and changed their meanings to support the corposystem modus operandi – which is to generate confusion. Also I have received more inquiries about the definition of corposystem. Therefore, over the next three or four blogs I plan to define the terms I use, and then proceed again to answer the question “what can we do?” but the short answer is that we will never understand what/why we need to do until we as individuals learn how to align our own opinions with the Facts of Life, and then use that knowledge to the benefit of the 7th generation to com.
DEFINITIONS
I provide these definitions, not to start another corposystem war over whose definition is better (who cares, we need words to talk with and we need to talk if we are to avoid more wars). My hope is, if you will understand my definitions (or yours) then we can both talk about the same things – worthwhile things — and not just argue over unimportant things while the balance of Life around is us is being destroyed by us.
Biology. The study of Life (all of Life, and the laws of nature that make Life possible on earth) using the scientific method. The scientific method requires study of measurable facts. If you aren’t using the scientific method to study measurable facts, then you technically are not a biologist, even if you know more about something than someone else who is defined as a biologist.
Scientific Method. The scientific method is the study of measurable facts followed by a formal review system that makes sure the discovered knowledge is available for discussion by the human community. Contrary to common usage, the study of Life without using the scientific method is not science. By definition, science and scientists use the scientific method to study measurable facts. It is entirely possible to study reality without using the scientific method, but then your results may or may not be measurable facts. There is nothing wrong with things that are not measurable facts. They aren’t science, but some of them are a lot nicer than science. The reason to keep these defined categories is the same as the reason for definitions. They are a great help to us in our efforts to align ourselves with realities of life, and so grow a satisfying world view, as discussed in Bare Bones Biology 175.
Basic Biology. This definition is the same as the above, but specifically refers to the learning to understand the natural laws that make Life possible, not to how we use these laws after we understand them.
Applied Biology. is the same as biological technology. The technological use of our scientifric (biological) understandings to make or do something that we want to make or do. Usually, in the modern corposystem, to make money. This includes technologists such as physicians, wildlife management professionals, etc. Any technological application of biology is applied biology. Most biologists in today’s world do not realize that applied biology is not basic biology. Applied biology can cause great harm to the Biosystem if its basic applications are not fully considered. Overpopulation is a perfect example of this fact of Life. Too many of one life form can unbalance the Biosystem in which it lives — so that species eats up all of its food and crashes that system. This is natural, but if we don’t want to crash our own system we should be considering the relationship between “saving lives” and the future welfare of the system of which we are a part.
Biology we cannot make conclusions about “good” and “bad” behaviors without considering the long-term expected results of these behaviors or we are likely to accidentally cause great harm. Applied sciences that do not consider the basic science usually make this kind of mistake. For this reason, technology is very dangerous without consideration of basic biology, and debates over what is right and what is wrong do not solve problems that are caused by ignoring the basic facts of Life.
Facts. Facts are things that we cannot change. There are at least two kinds of facts. First are historical facts; things like your date of birth; we can lie about them but we cannot change the reality, and anyhow, I’m not talking about history; I am talking about the laws of nature. The Laws of Nature are facts like gravity, weight, thermodynamics, measurable energy, evolution and death. The whole of human history and human power have grown in the human mind that wanted to understand the facts of Life IN ORDER TO SURVIVE into a comfortable future. That is, until the last few generations. Now, it seems, we no longer believe that our survival depends upon the facts of Life. Instead, we have come to believe that we can change the facts to suit ourselves. We even write books about it that I will not reference, but we actually believe them.
For these authors, the unfortunate thing about facts is that it doesn’t matter what we believe, the facts keep on going just the way they always have done, because a fact is not something humans decided to believe in. A fact is something that would be here even if there were no humans, and the bottom line fact is this — humans cannot survive without the living earth that gives us life – it is the forever facts that created the living earth Biosystem — and competing with that which gives us life does not make us big and wonderful and powerful; it makes us dead.
But of course we would be dead anyway, sooner or later, so the more important reason to understand the facts of Life is to avoid causing misery and suffering by fighting wars against realities that we cannot change, and to know the difference between what we humans can control and what we cannot control.
Community. The biological definition of community is very different from the social sciences definition. Biologically, a group of any one species (such as a group of people), the biological word for that is not community – it is population. The population of humans in College Station. The population of goatweeds on my ranch. The population of a certain kind of mosquito in the Brazos Valley.
The biological definition of community is: The system that is composed of all the plants and other organisms that live in the same area and interact with one another.
So biologically, a community is ALL the organisms. Because they all do interact with each other, either directly or indirectly. All the populations in the Brazos Valley. The population of goatweeds and of mosquitoes and of humans – all those populations of organisms together form the community of the Brazos Valley, along with all the millions more populations of organisms. When I say millions, we must consider the good rich soil of the bottom-land and all the other places where there are – yes – millions of different kinds of micro-organisms contributing to Life, if we haven’t killed them off, and all the plants and all the insects, the spiders that used to live here and everything else that is alive. That is the biological definition of community.
So it seems that everyone who is using the word community is not talking about the same thing – but we all are right. Whenever everyone is right, and they are all using the same words to mean different things, that is a perfect setup for arguments. But why argue? We do want the same thing; we only need to know what it is.
I believe a human community is a group of people who interact with each other in an emotional and social system that is very much like the physical system of a biological community. The function of biological communities is to promote the welfare of Life Itself, or one could say to maintain Life in environments that change. The biological community does this using the sustainable physical system of biological interactions.
The valid function of human communities is also to serve Life — so that Life may provide for us the earth, air, fire and water that we require to maintain our human communities. However, in practice, human communities in our culture primarily serve their own vision of human welfare, and they do this using emotional and intellectual interactions among humans, in addition to physical interactions. Our current culture unfortunately is not based in a sustainable system, which is why I keep on writing this blog.
Sustainable. This is a very interesting word. It does not mean that everything stays the same. It can mean that the essence survives indefinitely. The essence of Life is – Life. Life is sustainable on earth (so far) even though individuals cannot live forever. Well, really, BECAUSE individuals die (and for a lot of other reasons) and because life forms (species) that cause harm also become extinct, therefore Life on earth is sustainable. To understand sustainability one must begin with the core essence of a thing. The core essence of our culture is profit gained from growth. That is not sustainable on earth. Human social systems have been successful so long as the earth could provide enough resources of food, air, water and soil to support the human communities, but they are not sustainable (Diamond, Collapse). However, our economic system could be made sustainable if we were to rewrite all the corporate documents to require biological and economic sustainability as the prime directive, and enforce that directive with a sustainable rule of law.
What is a System? According to the dictionary, a system is “a set of connected things or parts forming a complex whole, in particular, a set of things working together as parts of a mechanism or an interconnecting network.” I was once advised, by a university professor with whom I was discussing some improvement that should be made in the educational system: “The function of an organization is to perpetuate itself.” I have remembered this comment because I believe that it is very true – if it cannot maintain itself, it’s not a viable or sustainable system.
I believe a system perhaps originates as a singularity – a rare and fortunate coming-together of a set of processes that function well to maintain an emergent (new and useful) process that contributes positively to the whole. The creation of the corporation might be an example – or the creation of Life on earth. The emergent function of the Biosystem is to maintain Life; the emergent function of the corposystem is to grow wealth.
In my own definition, a well-established system has at least two additional characteristics that make it more likely than not to perpetuate itself. The first is the ability to respond to modest changes in its environment. Climate change is a fact-based reality — an example of the Earth Biosystem/Ecosystem responding to change in the human populations. The second quality that systems develop to perpetuate themselves is protection from outside influences that might tend to cause disruption or require change. An example of this sort of thing might be human belief systems that protect social systems from disruptive ideas – for example, the climate-change deniers’ belief system permits him to continue believing in his life-style without change.
So my definition of a system is a group of processes that function together as parts of a complex interconnected whole that generates a specialized useful emergent property or function and is organized to perpetuate itself by balancing processes that ensure stability with processes that ensure variability.
The unique emergent property of the Biosystem is Life.
The unique emergent property of the Corposystem is its growth-related profit mechanism.
Emergent Property. An emergent property is a characteristic of a system that results when all the parts of the system function together, and is different from any of the parts separately. For example, the emergent property of Life results from a particular combination of things (molecules) that are not alive. An emergent property of water is that it is a liquid at room temperature. Water is made of oxygen and hydrogen that are gases at room temperature. There are many liquids, but water is a unique liquid. So the emergent property of water is the unique and very specific characteristics of water.
The whole earth ecosystem is an evolved system that uses the energy from the sun to maintain and increase complexity of life in a universe that is flowing toward entropy in accordance with what humans refer to as the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics. To accomplish a balanced, sustainable stability of Life, the billions of earth systems must be able to respond to change, within and without itself, and that capability is achieved through the Law of Evolution, or the ability to balance its billions of interacting processes in response to changes within and without itself. This is accomplished by the exquisite balance of the interacting web of limiting factors. In times of little environmental change, the limiting factors discourage variability by selecting processes or organisms that function to maintain stability. In times of environmental disruption, the limiting factors permit and select for biological variants (mutants). Whenever variability is increased, the system has more options to select forms that are able to function more effectively in the new or changed environmental conditions, so the whole system becomes more capable of change.
Potentially, limiting factors are each of the interacting factors that are required for Life to survive. For example, Life requires food; if there is not enough food, then food is a limiting factor.
The Biosystem is the Life of Earth. Life of earth is stable when all the interacting factors of its environment are stable. Life is sustainable because it can change when the interacting factors of its environment change. Life changes mostly by the process of evolution. Usually that involves responding to environmental change (change in limiting factors) using positive and negative selection by means of limiting factors. Useful species survive; harmful species become extinct.
The corposystem is a system that uses energy resources provided by the earth ecosystem to generate continual growth, and the function of the growth is to make profits that are used to make more growth. The corposystem operates by Ponzi economics, and therefore is neither stable (because the continual growth generates constant unbalancing and reorganization of the limiting factors) nor is it sustainable (because nothing can grow forever unless it has unlimited resources). At the current time the corposystem operates as though the Law of Evolution (which humans cannot change) is based in competition and power. It is not, see the above; evolution functions by balancing the limiting factors; the corposystem operates by growth, which unbalances the limiting factors. The modern human corposystem is defined by human laws and by-laws that require growth of both money and population, and we are now at the point where the earth provisions are not sufficient to accommodate this requirement. Therefore, the earth ecosystem is coming unbalanced, throwing up a myriad of different sorts of variables (climatic, genetic, social, economic, species extinctions) that wlll VERY soon, maybe 20 to 50 years, make our Biosystem unfit for human habitation.
We could make the corposystem both stable and sustainable if we would change the corposystem imperative (growth), and there are quite a few economics books available on this subject that are written by trained economists. I have not read them, but I do know it is biologically possible to grow a stable and sustainable human presence within Life of Earth if we were to balance the limiting factors of the corposystem and align them with the needs of the Biosystem. I also know if we choose not to do this for ourselves, then the limiting factors of the Biosystem will do it for us and we will become extinct, and Life will start over as it has done several times over the millions of years of its evolution.
Filed under: Biosystem Power, Climate Change, Community, Education, Population | Tagged: compassion, corposystem, definitions, happiness, key words: world view | Leave a comment »